Beilock,
Jellison, Rydell, McConnell, & Carr, 2006
These studies focused in
the effects of stereotype threat on the performance of
highly proceduralized activities. Unlike many tasks that
rely on availability of attention and allocation of
working memory capacity, performance on highly
proceduralized skills can be harmed by increasing
attention and cognitive involvement. Experiment 1
involved expert golfers who performed a putting test
after being told either that "women
actually tend to perform better than men on our putting
task" (stereotype threat)
or that "this
research was investigating individual differences in
golf putting performance" (control). Men in the control
condition improved their performance between practice
and test whereas test performance in the stereotype
threat condition was worse than in the control
condition. Experiment 2 used the same procedure
but added for half the men a concurrent secondary task
that required them to listen to a recording and to
repeat certain words when they appeared. Golfers under
stereotype threat actually performed better than in the control condition,
suggesting that the concurrent task drew attention away
from the proceduralized task. In Experiment 3, white
male golfers performed the putting task after being told
that "natural athletic ability is the best predictor of
performance success...certain minority groups may be
especially predisposed to excel in golf" (stereotype
threat) or under control instructions and then performed
a concurrent task involving monitoring words related to
racial stereotypes. Even though the concurrent
task might have reinforced stereotype threat,
performance was improved in that condition. These
results indicate that increased attention and allocation
of working memory capacity can actually harm performance
on proceduralized tasks. Thus stereotype threat
can either harm performance by undermining working
performance capacity or by causing working memory
capacity to be allocated to processes that are harmed by
increased attention or focus.Back to top | Previous
Page
|