Brown & Day,
2006
This paper contributes to
the literature examining the
effects of stereotype threat on performance on Raven's
Advanced
Progressive Matrices (APM) task, a non-verbal task that
has been described as "culture-reduced" and a relatively
"pure" measure of cognitive ability and reasoning
(see
Mayer &
Hanges,
2003;
McKay,
Doverspike, Bowen-Hilton, & Martin, 2002). African-American and White undergraduates completed the APM after being given standard instructions that "the
Advanced Progressive Matrices is a measure of
observation and clear thinking" (standard), that it
"is an IQ test...frequently used to measure individuals’ intelligence and
ability” (stereotype threat for African-Americans), or that it "is a series of puzzles" (low
stereotype threat). Performance on the APM was assessed
after controlling for differences
in ACT scores across experimental conditions. Results
showed that AMP performance was better for Whites than
for African-Americans under high stereotype threat and
standard instructions. However, the performance
gap was eliminated (and even reversed, though not
significantly) in the low threat condition, when the APM
was described as a series of puzzles. These
results show that stereotype threat can undermine
performance on tests that are viewed as free of cultural
bias and not reliant on reading skills or background
knowledge. It also suggests that "standard
instructions" used with many test instruments might
invoke stereotype threat; only when the APM was
described as a set of "puzzles" were performance
differences between African-Americans and Whites
eliminated.
Back to top | Previous
Page
|