Ford,
Ferguson, Brooks, & Hagadone, 2004
Two
correlational studies examined the buffering role of
coping sense of humor in stereotype threat. In
Experiment 1, men and women undergraduates completed the
Coping Humor Scale (CHS), a measure designed to assess
the use of humor as a coping strategy for dealing with
stressful situations and then answered two questions about
how well they typically perform on math and verbal
sections of standardized tests. For women, CHS
scores were correlated with estimates of their math, but
not their verbal, test performance. Women with
higher levels of coping humor reported performing more
positively on math tests. For men, CHS scores were
not significantly correlated with reported test
performance. In Experiment 2, women completed the
CHS then were asked to complete a math test that
reflected "people's mathematics ability and limitations"
and typically reflected gender differences (stereotype
threat for women) or that focused on assessing problem-solving
processes for which there are no gender differences (no
stereotype threat). In the stereotype threat
condition, women high in CHS performed better than women
low in CHS. There was no effect of CHS under low
stereotype threat. Mediational analyses suggested
that a coping sense of humor improved performance under
stereotype threat by reducing the anxiety typically
produced in such circumstances. These studies show
that individuals with a coping sense of humor are less
likely to manifest the typical consequences of
stereotype threat.
Back to top | Previous
Page
|