Inzlicht, McKay, & Aronson,
2006
This paper examines whether
being associated with stigma might reduce one's ability
to control attention and behavior. If self-control
is a limited resource, then coping with anxious feelings
and activated stereotypes, and avoiding
stereotype-confirmation under stereotype threat might
reduce the resources available to effectively regulate
behavior in other unrelated contexts. Three
experiments were conducted to test these hypotheses.
In Experiment 1, African-American undergraduates
completed measures designed to assess their anxious
expectations of being victims of prejudice and their
estimates of successful regulation of academic-relevant
behavior. Responses to these measures were
negatively correlated; individuals who expected to
be victims of prejudice reported lowered ability to
regulate behavior related to academic success. Experiment 2 involved Black and White undergraduates who
completed a task requiring high levels of
self-regulation (the Stroop task) after being led to
expect that they would later complete a difficult verbal
exam described as being either
diagnostic (stereotype threat for Blacks) or nondiagnostic (no stereotype threat) of intellectual
ability. Stroop performance was poor for Blacks under
stereotype threat compared with Blacks under no
stereotype threat and Whites overall. Experiment 3
involved women who were led to believe they would
complete a math or verbal test that either was or was
diagnostic of ability (stereotype threat for math) or
showed no gender differences (no stereotype threat). Before
beginning the test, the women were asked
to hold a handgrip as long as they could, a task
requiring self-regulation of physical resources. Women
held the handgrip for a shorter period when they
believed they were to take a diagnostic math test
compared with the other three conditions. These
studies show that stereotype threat can reduce the
ability to regulate both attentional and physical
behavior. Back to top | Previous
Page
|